From a client perspective the terminology of "orders" is not very customer friendly and it is also less suitable. Because it contains more than only orders, it also includes tasks. I prefer the term: "Projects".
Hi,
Due to the wide range of terminology used by our agency clients, we are unable to immediately change our existing feature names. However, we are planning to introduce a feature that allows users to customize these names. This is currently in the planning stage. We will evaluate the feasibility and prioritize development based on user feedback.
Yes, if we could change the names as needed especially the βorderβ to project instance that would be great. Glad Iβm not alone.
0 2 weeks ago Reply
Yeah orders makes no sense. It will be better "Projects" or "Tasks"
0 2 months ago Reply
2 months ago
Hi,
Due to the wide range of terminology used by our agency clients, we are unable to immediately change our existing feature names. However, we are planning to introduce a feature that allows users to customize these names. This is currently in the planning stage. We will evaluate the feasibility and prioritize development based on user feedback.
0 2 months ago Reply